New research shows business and investment leaders are limiting Scotland's potential
The David Hume Institute is challenging business and investment leaders to embrace change to realise the benefits of greater diversity in top leadership roles.
Read more here.
Press release from the David Hume Institute
6th September 2021
The David Hume Institute is challenging business and investment leaders to embrace change to realise the benefits of greater diversity in top leadership roles.
Scotland’s leading independent think tank, the David Hume Institute, today publishes new research finding a shocking lack of diversity in the top 200 business and investment leaders, less than in previous sectors analysed by the Institute.
Faster growth in diversity at the top level is needed if Scotland is going to benefit from a wider spectrum of thought leadership to maximise the country’s ability to overcome challenges such as increasing productivity, innovation and improving risk management.
The research analysed the leaders of top businesses, investment companies, angel investors and family businesses in Scotland. The analysis found:
There are still more leaders called John than there are female leaders (7% John and 5% female)
One in four (26%) have held positions at four services companies (Accenture, EY, McKinsey, PwC)
2 out of 3 (65%) of investment company leaders attended an elite university with 1 in 5 of these attending Oxford or Cambridge. This compares to 49% of Angel Investment leaders who attended an elite university.
9% of investment company leaders are female - falling behind the UK average (13%)
1 in 5 (20%) of angel investor leaders are female - higher gender diversity than others in the business sector
With 31% of the top business leaders also holding positions on other boards, this narrow pool of decision makers has significant influence beyond their own companies.
Understanding the diversity of who is making investment decisions in Scotland is critical as access to capital is cited as one of the barriers for increasing entrepreneurs from female and minority backgrounds.
The research also found
Three out of ten (31%) top leaders have postgraduate qualifications with 39% of these are MBAs.
Postgraduate education is becoming the norm for top leaders, so decision makers need to be mindful of who has access to postgraduate education if they want to reap the benefits of diversity of thought.
Susan Murray, director of the David Hume Institute, says:
“The David Hume Institute’s research clearly shows limited diversity of Scotland’s top business and investment leaders. Scotland needs its business leaders to not only champion diversity across their organisations. They need to be open to more immediate change at the most senior level to reap the benefits of more diverse thinking now.
“Currently those with resources and connections are more able to reach the top. This limits the pool of top decision makers meaning organisations are risking group-think. Diversity of thought helps risk analysis, innovation and productivity.
“Every business leader must choose to prioritise diversity of thought as we recover from the pandemic if Scotland’s businesses are to increase productivity and resilience to future risks. For Scotland to be in the Champions’ League for business and investment we need a more diverse squad.”
Blog: Are we picking the right top team?
Have you ever looked around a meeting room and noticed lots of similar people? The David Hume Institute’s latest research shows that the top leaders in Scotland do not reflect the diversity of the country.
by Lucy Higginson, David Hume Institute
8th October 2020
Have you ever looked around a meeting room and noticed lots of similar people? The David Hume Institute’s latest research shows that the top leaders in Scotland do not reflect the diversity of the country.
Diversity of thought and different life experiences can help problem solving and the ability of organisations to face shocks and build sustainably.
Lack of diversity in leaders is a threat which can lead to groupthink. Investment companies like Baillie Gifford and Blackrock are increasingly analysing leadership diversity because of the links to increased profit and innovation.
If I am honest, I thought the data would have shown more change in the five years since the Institute first undertook research with the Social Mobility Commission.
We know work by organisations like the ICAS Foundation and the Law Society of Scotland is broadening entrants to their professions. Changing the Chemistry has been championing diversity of thought on boards since 2012 and the National Advisory Council on Women and Girls is now in its third year. Initiatives like Pass the Mic and Equate Scotland’s speaker lists are helping to broaden the voices heard in the media.
But this week the issue at the top of the legal profession was highlighted by Supreme Court Judge Lord Reed’s comments on the lack of diversity in our top courts. And, last month the experience of barrister Alexandra Wilson highlighted unconscious bias in the legal profession in England. Law along with Business were the two sectors we found least diversity in the top leaders in Scotland.
Change is happening but it needs to happen faster at the top.
At the current rate, I will be retiring before the top leaders in Scotland are representative of the population.
Why does this matter?
We have big challenges on the road ahead. The aftermath of Covid-19 and the immediacy of climate change means business as usual is not an option. There is no time for fixed mindsets, leaders need to be open to being challenged. Digital disruption means many new opportunities but there will also be risks. We need every leader to be on their a-game.
The challenges ahead mean Scotland needs all of our current top leaders to actively champion diversity and proactively provide the opportunities to ensure faster progress for everyone’s benefit.
It is time for deeds not words.